Adidas misfires with Arsenal shirt Twitter campaign

Posted on July 8, 2019

 

Sportswear giant Adidas was left with some explaining to do last week, when social media troublemakers took advantage of a poorly thought out marketing campaign that caused offensive tweets to go out from the company’s account.

As part of the #DareToCreate campaign, Adidas allowed Twitter users to create an image of its new Arsenal FC shirt, with their handle printed above the squad number on the back. These were then tweeted at the user by the Adidas UK account, along with a link to buy the shirt.

The idea sounds innocent and fun enough, and plenty of Arsenal supporters embraced it in the way it was intended.

However, it wasn’t long before other users, either with a fondness for shock humour or a genuine desire to spread hateful material, started to use the tool to create much more inappropriate shirt names. These were promptly tweeted out by the Adidas UK account, which clearly did not have sufficient systems in place to detect sensitive names. A particularly offensive example can be seen here.

Speaking to HuffPost UK, Adidas said it was aware of “a small minority creating offensive versions” of the shirt and suspended the campaign. Arsenal FC also distanced itself from the behaviour, saying it had “no place in our game or society.”

We’ve been here before

Adidas is the latest in a long line of companies to have misjudged a social media campaign that allows for user creation. One of the most notable examples was in 2017 with the #WalkersWave campaign, where snack company Walkers allowed people to upload a selfie, which was then incorporated into a video. Brand ambassador Gary Lineker would hold a picture of the person’s face aloft and it was shown on a Mexican wave animation, but one or two of the uploaded faces were not quite in keeping with the intended spirit of the campaign.

Later that year, The National Lottery had to pull its #Represent campaign in conjunction with British Athletics after it was similarly targeted by pranksters. In this case, people who retweeted a National Lottery tweet were rewarded with a picture of an athlete holding a sign bearing their name, but some of the ‘names’ provided were not a good fit for the ethos of the Lottery or British Athletics.

These disasters are a reminder that although social media allows for personalised marketing campaigns, the public can be mean-spirited in how they use them. Safeguards need to be in place to ensure that offensive and unsuitable user-created images and videos are weeded out, and this perhaps means a need for human judgement, not just automation.

John Murray

Content Team Leader at Engage Web
John works for Engage Web as a Content Team Leader and regularly contributes to the website and programmes of his beloved Chester F.C.

Like us on Facebook to see more posts like this

You might also be interested in:

No Comments »

There are no comments on this yet, be the first to write a comment.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Have your say!

Call Now Button

We have worked with:

minute-man-press-image
TEL: 0345 621 4321