British media:

Here’s why your NI contributions are going up by much more than 1.25%

Posted on September 13, 2021

In news that will affect businesses, employees and self-employed people over the coming years, the government announced last Wednesday that it will be increasing National Insurance (NI) contributions as of the beginning of the 2022/23 financial year, but do people really understand what this means to them?

The tax rise will become a levy of its own – the Health and Social Care Levy – as of April 2023, but it will initially be introduced as an increase to NI contributions. A look through Google News on Wednesday afternoon confirmed that this was widely reported as a 1.25% increase.

With the exception of BBC News, which has clarified that it’s the future health and social care tax that equates to 1.25%, all of these sources are WRONG – including the usually excellent Money Saving Expert. Our NI contributions are actually not increasing by 1.25%, but by over 10%.

Why is this?

As this article explains, NI contributions are about to increase from 12% to 13.25%, so that surely is an increase of 1.25%, isn’t it?

Well, no. What we can say is that contributions are increasing by “1.25 percentage points” (as the BBC does here), as that simply acknowledges a numerical change in the percentage, but it’s a fairly meaningless detail. To accurately work out the rate of NI contribution increase, we need to work out a percentage of a percentage, which is a little more complicated than basic addition.

A simple example

To illustrate this problem, lets image that we have £100 in cash on a table. That figure means that we can take any portion out of the £100 and easily work out what percentage we’ve taken. So we can agree that:

• if we take £12, that’s 12% of the £100
• if we take £1.25, that’s 1.25% of the £100
• if we take £13.25, that’s 13.25% of the £100

The misapplication of percentages, however, comes if we take £12 initially, then come back later and take another £1.25, and assume that we have only increased the amount we’ve taken by 1.25%. This is because the £1.25 is 1.25% of the original £100 total, and not of the £12 we have already taken.

So to work out the percentage increase in the money we’ve pocketed, we need to work out what £1.25 is as a percentage of the £12 we took earlier. That comes out at 10.4166% – more than eight times higher than 1.25%. In fact, adding 1.5% to £12 would be an increase of just 15p!

Applying this to the NI hike

The NI hike (which incidentally breaks a pledge in the Conservative Party’s election manifesto, but that’s another rant for another time) is analysed by a separate article on the BBC website. As the bar chart shows us, someone on an annual salary of £20,000 currently pays £1,251 a year in NI, and this will go up by another £130 in 2022/23. That is a rise of 10.3916%, not 1.25%.

This shows that many reputable sources are, perhaps unwittingly, downplaying the scale of the NI hike by providing inaccurate figures. A more accurate headline would be any of the following:

• NI contributions to jump by 10.4% in 2022
• Britons’ NI contributions to increase by over a tenth/nearly a ninth
• You will pay 110.4% of your current NI contributions next tax year

Can you imagine the reaction if the last one of these was popularised? It’s perfectly accurate – it just chooses to use big-looking numbers to make its point.

Why does this matter?

We are presented with facts and figures every day, and sometimes there’s more to them than meets the eye. They can easily be at best manipulated, at worst misreported.

From an internet marketing point of view, this can be applied to your web traffic and conversion rates. Are you working out percentages of percentages correctly? Is your site performing better than your figures suggest at first, or are you misguidedly sitting on your laurels? Take the time to do the maths, as sometimes the figures really don’t make a lot of sense without it.

Posted by John Murray

Is Boris Johnson dabbling in SEO again?

Posted on June 30, 2020

Last year, after Boris Johnson had replaced Theresa May as UK Prime Minister, some keen-eyed observers noted that one or two of his more unorthodox actions and remarks were having interesting effects on internet searches related to him.

The most notable example was his talk of a hobby involving painting wine boxes to look like buses, and the effect it had on (more…)

Posted by John Murray

Should we share content we don’t agree with?

Posted on June 29, 2020

On social media, it’s no secret that people tend to like, comment and share articles they haven’t read beyond the title, but a controversy last week opens up debate about the dangers of doing this, as well as whether we should share material we don’t 100% agree with.

Last week, Shadow Education Secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey was asked to (more…)

Posted by John Murray

New generation increasingly turning to Instagram for news

Posted on June 23, 2020

According to a new report, which looked at the digital news sector, Instagram is well on its way to becoming a more popular source for news than Twitter – particularly with the younger (more…)

Posted by Alan Littler

Three strange and swiftly deleted tweets from reputable organisations

Posted on May 26, 2020

Sometimes, the most outrageous and unlikely of tweets come from the most official and serious of sources. This might be entirely by mistake, but occasionally it’s a deliberate act of rebellion and sabotage.

Here are three occasions on which people following professional accounts must have spat out their coffee in amazement at what they had seen on (more…)

Posted by John Murray

It’s time journalists learned the difference between England and the UK

Posted on May 21, 2020

Yesterday, I saw an article that reminded me of a common misunderstanding displayed even by trained writers and journalists – we don’t understand the country we live in. Misuse of the terms ‘England’, ‘Britain’ and ‘UK’ is causing misinformation to thrive, and statistics to be either manipulated or just plain wrong.

The piece in question was by (more…)

Posted by John Murray

Government wants your COVID-19 risk assessment on your website

Posted on May 12, 2020

Yesterday, the website published its latest guidance to employers on getting the country safely back to work. This includes five “key points” employers should address as soon as is practically possible, and one of them in particular stood out to us.

Point 2 sets out the need for employers to carry out a risk assessment, and to (more…)

Posted by John Murray

Three questions to ask when adding links to your website

Posted on February 21, 2020

Inserting links into your site, whether they direct users to another part of the site or somewhere else entirely, is a neat and modern way to get people where they need to be online. In 2020, it’s pretty awkward and old-fashioned to write “go to Engage Web’s website” when you could just say “click here”.

There are things that (more…)

Posted by John Murray
Older Posts »
Call Now Button

Who Engage Web has helped:

Ice Lolly Minuteman Press BUNZLGS1 UK The Underfloor Heating Store West Cheshire Athletic Club Thomas Cook MWB Business ExchangeWeb Media 360 D2 Architects Beacon Financial Training Steely ProductsBurlydam Garden Centre Asentiv BodyHQ Clever Vine Endeavour Mortgages Pro Networks Comm-Tech Wickers World Ascot Mortgages Top Teks
TEL: 0345 621 4321